• DigitalDealer-horizontal-Logo
  • ATTEND LAS VEGAS
    • Attendee
      • Registration & Pricing
      • Agenda At-A-Glance
      • Exhibitor List/Floor Plan
      • Sponsor List
      • Hotel & Travel
      • Hosted Dealer Program
      • FAQ
      • Mobile App
    • Exhibitor
      • Exhibit/Sponsor
      • Advertising Opportunities
      • Exhibitor Resources
      • Exhibitor Tips
    • Education
      • Overview
      • Show Schedule
  • ABOUT
    • Conference Overview
    • Best Of Awards
    • Become a Speaker
    • Press Inquiries
    • Partnership Programs
    • Health & Safety
    • Contact Us
    • Get Updates
  • RESOURCES
    • Webinars
    • Downloads
  • NEWS
    • Auto Retail News
    • Digital Editions
    • Press Releases
    • Submit Editorial
    • Subscribe
  • .
  • ATTEND LAS VEGAS
    • Attendee
      • Registration & Pricing
      • Agenda At-A-Glance
      • Exhibitor List/Floor Plan
      • Sponsor List
      • Hotel & Travel
      • Hosted Dealer Program
      • FAQ
      • Mobile App
    • Exhibitor
      • Exhibit/Sponsor
      • Advertising Opportunities
      • Exhibitor Resources
      • Exhibitor Tips
    • Education
      • Overview
      • Show Schedule
  • ABOUT
    • Conference Overview
    • Best Of Awards
    • Become a Speaker
    • Press Inquiries
    • Partnership Programs
    • Health & Safety
    • Get Updates
  • RESOURCES
    • Webinars
    • Downloads
  • NEWS
    • Auto Retail News
    • Digital Editions
    • Press Releases
    • Submit Editorial
    • Subscribe

DealerPoint: May 21-23, 2024
Conference & Expo:
October 8-10, 2024

REGISTER NOW EXHIBIT / INQUIRE
Q

NEWS:

Dealer Management | Dealer/GM News | Finance & Insurance News | Ownership
June 10, 2010

OEMs Continue to Play Hard Ball with Dealers

Posts:
Dealer Management | Dealer/GM News | Finance & Insurance News | Ownership
June 10, 2010

OEMs Continue to Play Hard Ball with Dealers

A number of going-forward GM dealers recently received an unexpected “welcome letter” from New GM.  The welcome letter did not include words of encouragement or a thank you for hanging in there through GM’s bankruptcy mess.  Instead, New GM’s version of a hardy welcome was a letter notifying dealers that the SFE incentive chargebacks that were pending by Old GM prior to the bankruptcy proceedings would be levied against the dealer’s open account by New GM.  These chargebacks ranged from $200,000 to a crippling $900,000.  With dealers struggling to stay in the black while New GM has taken months to initiate its new marketing strategy and ramp up production of vehicles, the resurrection of these Old GM chargebacks is a real kick in the gut!

To make matters worse, New GM announced that it was not offering these dealers any right to challenge the chargeback.  New GM simply said on a certain date it will levy the chargeback or the dealer could choose a payment plan.  New GM’s rigid position was made all the more egregious by the fact that these same dealers had sought and were granted the right to mediate the chargeback with Old GM.  Unfortunately, Old GM’s bankruptcy proceedings occurred before the mediations could take place.

New GM’s position is that the going-forward dealers waived any right they had to challenge the chargeback as provided under the Dealer Agreement or state franchise laws when they signed their Participation Agreements which granted the dealers the right to go forward with New GM.  The attorneys at our firm do not believe GM’s interpretation of the Participation Agreement or the state franchise laws is correct.

Dealers who are subject to the resurrection of these SFE chargebacks have two strong arguments.  First, it is not at all clear that New GM assumed the right to seek these chargebacks as part of its purchase of major assets from Old GM.  In a 363 Sale of Major Assets, the bankrupt entity’s outstanding claims typically remain an asset of the bankruptcy estate.  Second, many state franchise laws will apply to allow a protest of the chargeback regardless of the terms of the broad release contained in the Participation Agreement.  Although their dealer agreements are not in the usual format but instead in the form of the Participation Agreement, the going-forward dealers meet the definition of a dealer/franchisee under state franchise laws and therefore should enjoy all the protections that dealers with a customary Sales and Service Agreement enjoy.

Dealers of all brands should never assume your manufacturer representatives are properly informed when they tell you your state franchise laws don’t apply to a certain situation.

Manufacturers, in this case New GM, neither understand the breadth of state franchise laws nor want those laws to interfere with their ability to strong-arm dealers.

Toyota continues to hold dealer agreements hostage:

We continue to receive calls from dealers who are being told by Toyota Motor Sales that their soon to expire Dealer Agreement will not be renewed for the standard six-year term unless the dealer commits to construction of the Image II facility.

Dealers having the renewal of their Dealer Agreement held hostage by TMS should immediately turn to their state franchise laws for help.  Almost all state franchise laws specifically require a manufacturer to renew a Dealer Agreement unless there exists “good cause” to nonrenew the Agreement.  Some states go further and specifically prohibit the manufacturers from non-renewing a Dealer Agreement as a result of a dealer’s failure to upgrade the dealership facility.  In either case, if the dealer feels comfortable that the requested upgrades are not reasonable under the dealer’s circumstances then the manufacturer has violated the state franchise law by not providing the dealer with a full term Dealer Agreement.

Update on GM and Chrysler arbitration proceedings:

As I write this column (May 5), BSM is in the midst of conducting its first reinstatement arbitration and, beginning next week, we will have more than one arbitration each week through the second week of June. 

We expect these arbitrations to take an average three days.  On the dealership side, the dealership principal, general manager, CFO or accountant and an expert on sales performance will provide testimony.  On the manufacturer side, the regional or district representative, dealer network development representative and a sales performance expert will provide testimony.  GM has also submitted affidavits of senior managers in lieu of their live testimony.  We are, of course, objecting to this tactic in that we do not have the opportunity to cross-examine these individuals live in front of the arbitrator.

Both GM and Chrysler have refused to produce documents related to its business plan for the terminated dealer’s market and specific to the performance of any other dealer in the market.  GM and Chrysler have taken this position despite the fact that in most of these cases GM and Chrysler are claiming poor sales performance on the part of the terminated dealer.

GM’s Retail Sales Index and Chrysler’s Minimum Sales Responsibility are based upon the performance of all same brand dealers in the state.  Furthermore, in situations where GM and Chrysler are not simply reducing the number of franchises within the market but have handed the terminated franchises to another dealer within the market, the performance of that other dealer is entirely relevant.  We have made these arguments to the arbitrators in seeking to compel additional documents with mixed results.

The vast majority of these arbitrations appear to be coming down to the terminated dealer’s sales performance.  In preparing for the reinstatement arbitration, dealers with poor sales performance must identify circumstances within their market that are different than other markets within the state and which are out of the dealer’s control.

Through this process, we have discovered that some dealers have had their market territories improperly drawn causing them to be responsible for a larger sales territory than what is reasonable.  In one case, we discovered that GM had not redrawn a dealer’s territory after GM had added a same linemake dealer to the market.  This was a double whammy for the arbitrating dealer’s sales performance in that he was responsible for a larger territory than he could reasonable penetrate while having a new dealer selling right outside his backdoor.

What we have discovered in preparing these cases for arbitration should be a reminder to all dealers to review your assigned areas of responsibility closely and make sure adjustments are made when there is a change in the dealer network within your market.  Ask questions and hold your manufacturer accountable to a proper assignment of territory.

Unlike Chrysler which has maintained a hard line on reinstating dealers through settlement, GM has continued to reinstate dealers.  In addition to the first wave of reinstatements of primarily Cadillac dealers, GM has continued to reinstate arbitrating dealers of all brands by way of a settlement agreement containing certain performance standards.  We started off with 75 GM and Chrysler arbitration matters.  Through settlements, reinstatements and a few dealers withdrawing their arbitration claim, we now have approximately 15 pending arbitration hearings.

Although these settlements are a positive development, GM’s actions in continuing to reinstate dealers causes their business plan argument to lose all credibility.  Keep in mind that GM is going to great length to convince these arbitrators that it must reduce its dealer count and combine certain franchises under one roof in order to be competitive going forward.  This position is difficult to maintain considering the large number of reinstatements to date.

By the time this column hits the printer, we will have much more information related to how arbitrators are ruling on reinstatement of GM and Chrysler dealers which, to the extent permitted by confidentiality agreements, I will share in my next column.

 

 

 

Dealer Management•Dealer/GM News•Finance & Insurance News•Ownership

SHARE

Share on Email
Share on Linkedin
Share on Facebook
Share on Pinterest
Share on Twitter
← Previous Article Next Article →
Posts Marketing & Advertising

7 Strategies for Car Dealers to Run Event Marketing

Event Marketing is a strategy used by car dealerships to promote their vehicles, services, and overall brand through organized events. These events can range from new car inventory, exclusive test drives, and service workshops to participation in lar
Posts Dealer/GM News

CarGurus Deal Acquiring CarOffer is Completed; Zach Hallowell Named CEO

CarGurus completed the acquisition of CarOffer, purchasing the remaining minority equity interests for $75 million on Dec. 4. CarGurus acquired a 51% interest in CarOffer in January 2021 and announced plans last month to accelerate the purchase of th
Posts Marketing & Advertising

7 Strategies for Car Dealers to Run Event Marketing

Event Marketing is a strategy used by car dealerships to promote their vehicles, services, and overall brand through organized events. These events can range from new car inventory, exclusive test drives, and service workshops to participation in lar
Posts Industry Press Releases

Step One Automotive Group Announces 25 Days of Giving Across Alabama, Florida, and Georgia

Step One Automotive Group will dedicate 25 Days of Giving within the communities they serve in Alabama, Florida, and Georgia. Throughout the month, expect to see Step One Automotive Group team members spreading holiday cheer to those in need. “
Posts Dealer/GM News

Haig Report Finds Mixed Results In Dealership Deals–More Deals, Lower Prices

While values declined slightly this year, 2023 is on pace to be the third most active year for the selling of U.S auto dealerships. That is one of the main takeaways of the Haig Report for third quarter 2023 that stated at least 385 rooftops have tra
Posts Dealer/GM News

New Research Reveals Age and Gender Differences in Vehicle Add-On Purchases

When consumers purchase cars at an auto dealer, they often buy supplemental products and services called voluntary protection products (VPPs). These provide additional coverage and protection for certain vehicle components or services not covered by
Posts Dealer/GM News

Nearly 4,000 Car Dealers Ask President Biden to Slow Down EV Push

Car dealers are asking President Joe Biden to “tap the brakes” in his administration’s electric vehicle (EV) push. A total of 3,882 franchised car dealers the U.S., calling themselves the EV Voice of the Customer, published the letter on No
Posts Data & Analytics

Digital Retailing Continues to Grow at Auto Dealerships

A recent report found car dealers offering consumers the ability to do a deal online has grown to 40% in the last year—but an urgent need to cutdown on repetitive steps happening in the showroom. Nearly all car dealers currently using digital retai

NEWSLETTER

SUBSCRIBE

DEALER MAGAZINE

Dealer Magazine March/April 2023 Issue Featuring an Interview with NADA 2023 Chairman
MAGAZINE

Explore All Our Brands

FOLLOW US ON

  • Follow
  • Follow
  • Follow
  • Follow
  • Follow
© 2023 Emerald X, LLC. All Rights Reserved.

ABOUT    CAREERS    AUTHORIZED SERVICE PROVIDERS   DO NOT SELL MY PERSONAL INFORMATION   TERMS OF USE   PRIVACY POLICY